Reports and magazine articles are revealing that the trouble with wearing wearables is stirring up controversy around the globe. This does not come as a surprise when you consider that we are living in the digital age. Critics in the past warned us that privacy and ethics would become issues once wearables became in use.
When it comes to wearables, security becomes a big issue that cannot be overlooked or ignored. Unfortunately, some companies are not taking heed to this. They continue to harness the power of modern technology to keep a close eye on emissions, enhance the well being of their employees, and calculate difficult scientific analyses to get a better understanding on our health. These impressive innovations offer wonderful solutions to our society, but we cannot overlook their potential to have a negative impact on us.
1.Dealing with Difficult Questions
It's not unusual for some companies like Inertia Engineering to push the envelope when it comes to technology and privacy. They are interested in making profits and maintaining an edge over their competitors. For instance, some companies require their employees to wear embedded chips so that their behavior and productivity can be monitored closely. This may seem like a good idea, but it comes with a great cost.
Wearables are also commonly used in the healthy industry. They can gather accurate data on the wearers. In this instance, the wearables help physicians determine if their patients have a healthy lifestyle.
Privacy becomes a big concern when it comes to this controversial issue. Consumers are worried that someone will be able to gain direct access to their personal information. It's not unusual for consumers to get the impression that their information could be shared with third parties. Unanswered questions could lead to serious repercussions for consumers and companies.
2.Giving the Public a Peace of Mind
Governments around the world understand that the public have a deep concern about wearables. This is the primary reason why they introduce regulations that are designed to protect consumers from potential harm from scrupulous parties. To deal with these concerns, public and private sectors must work together. At this point, a ninety day public consultation is underway. They are creating a set of guidelines that will govern personalized health technology.
3. Studying the Past
We must study the past if we are really interested in making a difference with this technology. Studying the past will help us learn from our mistakes. Conventional wisdom will tell anyone that learning from your past will help you avoid making the same mistakes when it comes to wearable tech considerations.
The Human Genome Project is one prime example of this philosophy. Ethical issues were on the forefront in the beginning, but they were quelled once social, ethical, and legal implications were taken into consideration. It's reasonable to assume that adopting the same approach for personalized health technologies will reap the same benefits. We will be able to enjoy the rewards of getting good statistics and accurate data. At the end of the day, it will be a win-win situation for everyone.